Should Hillary now run as an Independant candidate? The answer is “yes”!
Hillary has over 18M votes in her column as a DNC primary candidate and with that kind of muscle she would make the most formidable Independant candidate since Ross Perot in 1992.
For those of you who don’t know lets make a case. According to Wikipedia, “… Ross Perot received 18.9% of the popular vote - approximately 19,741,065 votes (but no electoral college votes), making him the most successful third-party presidential candidate in terms of the popular vote since Theodore Roosevelt in the 1912 election. A detailed analysis of the voting demographics revealed that Perot’s support drew heavily from across the political spectrum, with 20% of his votes coming from self-described liberals, 27% from self-described conservatives, and 53% coming from self-described moderates. Economically, however, the majority of Perot voters (57%) were middle class, earning between $15,000 and $49,000 annually, with the bulk of the remainder drawing from the upper middle class (29% earning over $50,000 annually). Exit polls also showed that Ross Perot drew 38% of his vote from Bush, and 38% of his vote from Clinton, while the rest of his voters would have stayed home in his absence on the ballot.”
Second point - This is Hillary’s best shot at the presidency. If Obama is elected in ‘08, he will be an incumbant in 2012, Hillary would have to wait until 2016 to run again as a Democrat.
Third point - There is no guarantee that someone better won’t be running in 2016 as a Democrat. More than likely the mood of the country will have swung back towards Repukes by then.
Fourth point - By 2016, most of her supporters and contributors will have abandoned her.
In summary, if Hillary has a shot at all - the time is now! Go for it Hill - Don’t leave us with this big-talking all-rhetoric candidate! The world needs a real leader - not a wimp - who can shoot a 3-pointer.